Car accidents often lead to a wide range of legal complexities. One vital question that often arises is whether a police report can be used against you in court.
While a police report typically cannot establish fault conclusively in a Tennessee car accident lawsuit, it can potentially be used against you. Especially if the report contains damaging details, such as admissions of fault or contradictory statements. Understanding the role of police reports in any legal proceeding is essential for anyone involved in a car accident. In most cases, these reports cannot be admitted as evidence in a trial. But that does not mean they do not play a crucial role in insurance negotiations. In fact, your police report will be a vital instrument for both parties when deciding on a strategy.
For a free case analysis with our Tennessee car accident attorneys, contact Howe Law today by calling (844) 876-4357.
Can a Police Report Be Used Against You in Court During a Car Accident Lawsuit in Tennessee?
In Tennessee car accident lawsuits, the admissibility of police reports as evidence often becomes a point of contention. While these reports provide crucial details about the incident, they are generally considered hearsay. This means that it will likely not be used against you, but you also will not be able to admit it as evidence in your trial. Our Nashville car accident attorneys can help you understand what information in the report will be helpful. The following details why police reports are usually not admitted as evidence in a car accident lawsuit:
The Admissibility of Police Reports
Under Tennessee Rule of Evidence 801, hearsay is defined as a statement made outside of court offered to prove the issue the statement addresses. This means that any statements made outside of court are generally blocked from being admitted into evidence if they are being used to prove the truth of the statement’s assertions.
Since police reports are themselves statements written out of court, they qualify as hearsay and would typically be blocked from being admitted as evidence under Rule 802.
However, Rule 803(8) allows for the admission of police reports in civil injury cases under certain conditions. Still, any hearsay within hearsay contained within the report, such as a quotation from a witness, is not admissible unless it also meets an exception for hearsay within hearsay. This is because the officer writing the report is not actually the person who made the original statement hearsay within hearsay.
Secondly, the report can only be used if the information was observed by the officers themselves. This means that the officer must have personally witnessed the events or facts recorded in the report for it to be admissible. Information relayed to the officer by another person cannot be included.
The information must also be trustworthy. If the court determines that the circumstances indicate a lack of trustworthiness in the police report, it can be blocked from admission as evidence.
Admitting the Officer’s Opinions
Police reports are meant to provide a neutral account of the incident. They detail who was involved, what happened, where and when the incident occurred, and other relevant facts. They are not intended to decide who was at fault in an accident.
That is why Tennessee Rule of Evidence 701 generally restricts individuals from giving their opinion during testimony. This rule extends to written opinions as well, which includes police reports. Therefore, any opinion expressed by a police officer in a report about who was at fault in an accident is typically inadmissible.
This is because the question of fault is considered an “ultimate issue,” a key question that the jury or judge must decide. Allowing a witness to express an opinion on an ultimate issue could potentially usurp the role of the jury or judge.
However, if a police officer can be certified as an expert in a relevant field, such as accident reconstruction, their report might be admissible as an expert opinion under Rule 702. To qualify as an expert, the officer would need to demonstrate specialized knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education in their field. They would also need to prove that their testimony is based on reliable methods and that they have applied these methods correctly to the facts of the case.
But this is rare. More often than not, officers will be called into court to testify specifically to what was in the report.
Statements in the Police Report Made by a Party Opponent
According to Rule 803(1.2), statements made by an opposing party are not excluded by the hearsay rule. This means that if you made a statement that is critical to the case in the report, the other side can have it admitted as evidence in court since you are the opposing party.
The rationale behind this exception is that people are unlikely to make statements against their own interests unless they are true. Therefore, these statements are considered more reliable than other types of hearsay and are allowed to be presented as evidence.
If you or the defendant made a statement at the accident scene suggesting fault, for example, admitting to speeding or not paying attention, this statement could be used by the other party. However, the admissibility of such statements often hinges on the specific circumstances. The court will consider factors like when and where the statement was made, the context of the statement, and the overall reliability of the information.
Moreover, while a party’s statements can be powerful evidence, they are not conclusive proof of liability. They are just one piece of evidence that the court will consider alongside other factors like physical evidence from the accident scene, witness testimony, and expert analysis.
Can an Insurance Company Use a Police Report to Deny a Car Accident Claim in Tennessee?
In Tennessee, car accident cases are typically paid by the at-fault driver’s insurance company. This often means that the claimant must deal with an insurance company that might be looking for reasons to deny their claim or reduce the damages.
Insurance companies are businesses, and like all businesses, they aim to minimize their expenses. As such, they might scrutinize all available evidence, including police reports, to find reasons to deny a claim or reduce the compensation amount.
For example, if a police report indicates that the claimant violated a traffic law, the insurance company might argue that this violation contributed to the accident and, therefore, reduces the at-fault driver’s liability. Similarly, if the report suggests that the claimant was not injured in the accident, the insurance company might use this to dispute a claim for medical expenses.
However, while an insurance company can use a police report in these ways, it usually cannot unilaterally decide to disregard a police report or deny a claim based solely on its contents. Our team can typically use other pieces of evidence to counter the arguments of the insurance company.
Our Tennessee Car Accident Lawyers Can Determine the Best Use for the Police Report in Your Case
Call Howe Law at (844) 876-4357 to speak with our Knoxville car accident attorneys and get your free case review.
Related Articles
